Skip to main content

Antenna Topics: Antenna Trimming Shortcut. Post #205

Most of us who use the general formula for a half-wavelength flat top dipole (468/f (Mhz)=L (ft), rarely give much thought on how accurate the dipole length really is.  We cut the dipole to its calculated length, cut the wire in half, attach center connector and insulators, attach a length of 50 or 75 - ohm coaxial cable, suspend the wire between two tall supports, and prepare for a day of radio fun.  In most cases, your dipole will work well, although a little trimming or pruning may be necessary to bring the wire antenna into resonance.

I'll admit to being lazy in this department.  As long as the SWR falls below 1.5 to 1, I don't bother trimming.  Even if the SWR hovers around 1.7 to 2.0 to 1, I always can use my trusty Drake MN-4 to bring the SWR below 1.5 to 1.

Suppose you wanted to make your antenna (in this case for 40 meters), as resonant as possible and do without a tuner altogether?  Instead of cutting and trimming, wouldn't it be nice just to cut the dipole length once and come up with a low SWR?

After doing a bit of research in several ARRL documents, I found an article by Joseph H. NeCamp (W4JBQ) in the 11th Edition of "Hints and Kinks for the Radio Amateur" that addresses that issue.  Following Mr. NeCamp's example, I duplicated his pruning example with a temporary 40 meter flat top dipole in my backyard.  I used two 33-foot (10.06 meters) MFJ fiberglass masts to support the antenna.

Like Mr. NeCamp, I cut a dipole resonant at 7.05 MHz using the general dipole formula (468/f (MHz)=L (ft).  The length of the dipole worked out to be 66.4 feet/20.24 meters or 33.2 feet/10.12 meters for each dipole element.  A check with a SWR bridge showed resonance around 7.15 MHz.  Obviously, my original calculated length was off by quite a bit.  I would have to add some more wire to each element to make the dipole resonant.  Here's how  W4JBO adjusted things:

"Multiplying the original 66.4 feet times the actual resonant frequency of 7.15 MHz yields 475, a new constant to use in the formula in this particular installation."  NeCamp continues by saying: "L=475/7.05=67.4 feet.  If the original short dipole is lengthened to 67.4 feet (20.54 meters), the resonant frequency will be very close to the desired 7.05 MHz."

I tried this pruning method and it works.  With each dipole element measuring 33.7 feet/10.27 meters. I had a SWR of 1.2 to 1 at the desired frequency without using the Drake MN-4.  Of course results will depend on your dipole's height above ground, the type of coax used as the feed line, and surrounding objects which could detune the antenna.  I was able to remove the antenna transmatch and enjoyed a casual afternoon of "rag chewing" on 40 meter cw.

REFERENCE:

NeCamp, Joseph H. (W4JBQ).  An Antenna - Pruning Shortcut.  Contained in "Hints and Kinks for the Radio Amateur", 11th Edition. Copyright 1982.  ARRL, Newington, CT, 06111. Page 5-9.

You can follow our blog community with a free email subscription or by tapping into the blog RSS feed.

For the latest amateur radio news, please visit my news site--http://kh6jrm.com.  I've included a few headline stories at the bottom of this post.

Thanks for joining us today!

Aloha es 73 de Russ (KH6JRM)

BK29jx15--along the beautiful Hamakua Coast of Hawaii Island.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

G5RV Multi Band HF Dipole Antenna. Post #1555.

If you can't see the video, please insert this title URL into your browser search box: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeNHIQ_j4Dk

This well-produced and richly illustrated tutorial on the classic G5RV HF Dipole Antenna was presented to the Brandon Amateur Radio Society in Brandon, Florida in 2017 by Bernie Huth (W4BGH).  Bernie does an excellent job of  explaining the pros and cons of this popular HF antenna from the late Louis Varney (G5RV).  Although Varney envisioned his design primarily as a 3/2 wavelength antenna for the 20 meter Amateur Radio band, radio amateurs have used the antenna for multiband use.  The G5RV is an excellent choice for the 20 meter band.  Performance on other HF Amateur Radio bands is good enough to qualify as stand alone HF antenna if you can only erect one HF antenna.

For the latest Amateur/Ham Radio news and information, please visit these websites:

http://www.HawaiiARRL.info.
http://www.arrl.org.
http://www.arrl.org/arrl-audio-news (a weekly podca…

Amateur Radio Bicycle Mobile Setup. Post #1554.

If you can't see the video, please insert this title URL into your browser search box: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zWb-KnkGdY.

Here's a way to use Amatuer/Ham Radio while you work on shedding a few pounds in useful exercise.  Why not equip your bicycle for 2 meter/70 cm mobile operation?

In this short, well-made video, "taverned" shows us how he used a mag mount antenna, a simple C clamp, and a basic ground system to convert his mountain bike into a mobile station.  The project is straight forward, simple, and gives you emergency communications while you peddle down the road.

For the latest Amateur/Ham Radio news and information, please visit these websites:

http://www.HawaiiARRL.info.
http://www.arrl.org.
http://www.arrl.org/arrl-audio-news (a weekly podcast which is updated each Friday afternoon).
https://hamradiohawaii.wordpress.com.
https://bigislandarrlnews.com.
https://amateurradionewsinformation.com (Amateur Radio News & Information).
https://www.eha…

An 80-Meter Vertical Helix

Like many amateur radio operators, I live on a small lot surrounded by neighbors, utility lines, and civic-minded citizens concerned about the "attractiveness" of my community.  Whether by design or outright fear, I've adopted the "stealth" approach to ham radio antennas.  It's the old "out of sight, out of mind" idea applied to amateur radio antennas.

The amateur radio press is full of articles describing the struggle of amateur radio operators to pursue their hobby under the burdensome regulations of CC & Rs, HOAs, and other civic minded citizens who object to antenna farms.  So far, my modest verticals, loops, and inverted vees have blended well with the vegetation and trees bordering my small backyard.  Vertical antennas have always been a problem because of the limited space for a radial system.  There are times, however, where a shortened vertical for the lower HF bands (such as 80/75 meters) is necessary where horizontal space is lacki…